Note.—This resolution in the Bulletin. Please formal errors so that BOARD MEETING OF: CALENDAR NO.: PREMISES: ACTION OF BOARD THE VOTE — Affirmative: Chair Commissioner Commissioner Negative: THE RESOLUTION The decision August 26, 2025, pertinent part: 1. ZR24-11: permitted Sec. 24-11. 2. ZR24-36, 24-36 and 3. ZR24-50: 24-591. BSA This is an application variance, under Z.R. which permitted, enlargement of an and height requirements. School (“applicant” A public hearing after due notice by hearing on February Community application. The board of directors The Premises 73rd Street and south district, in Manhattan. East 73rd Street, 38 square feet of lot community facility Street and an 8-story The Board has approximately 1960-1961, Board permitted the connecting to the the second-floor window On September Board granted a under Z.R. § 73-641, (“LH”)-1A) district, existing community requirements, on BSA-approved drawings; forth in the conditional activities on the occupancy; DOB issue of this resolution; verification by DOB of the Zoning Resolution, relevant laws under construction be completed The applicant horizontal and vertical corridor to connect non-compliances Specifically, the applicant 1 These approximate filing of a case of this 1960 (that record is that case description final resolution of the 60-BZ, including the as of the time of the Cal. No. 907-86-BZ. 4th, 5th, 6th, and science, Spanish, storage; breakout rooftop corridor for The proposed result in the following non-compliance and feet of lot coverage western rear lot line, three building height the development, Because, in the the subject site to (70%) (Z.R. §§ 24-11 with a minimum and a maximum height the relief requested Over the course primarily about the the existing non-compliances, the effects of the encroachment In response, the student body lives School. The applicant gradual student enrollment to substantially programmatic needs, ensure that it can specific educational The applicant submitting additional Walsh Building and generated by the prior grant under property (i.e., acquisition East 73rd Street, (installation of a rooftop generator of the bulkhead mechanical units mezzanine expansion, was constructed in additional seating. extension was as applicant notes that included in the total Regarding the applicant notes that, entirety of the rear the western, rear response to community hearings, the applicant into the rear yard, 11" shown on the that this is a critical increase in space flexibility for various room is limited. By correspondence states, in relevant fence at the edge door installed to create The Fire Department a letter from the confirm that the proposed code sections for firefighter the design is not applicant must seek Management. The project is 617.2 of 6 NYCRR. of the proposed action the project in the 2026. The EAS documents significant adverse socioeconomic conditions; historic and cultural natural resources; infrastructure; solid transportation; air change; noise; public disadvantaged communities. By correspondence Preservation Commission applicant’s EAS, document appears The applicant Appropriateness stating, in relevant appropriate to the approve the application. to the design required for review and approval letter. No other significant require an Environmental the foregoing, the not have a significant Based upon its that the proposed as set forth below. Therefore, it is does hereby issue Article 8 of the New 6 NYCRR Part 617, Quality Review and amend the resolution, this portion of the the building, on substantially conform ‘Approved Plans’ — and on further condition: the bulk THAT as follows: a maximum yard at the western by 9'-11"; and a maximum of 75'-8" feet, as illustrated THAT HVAC regulations as determined THAT all work Certificate of Appropriateness THAT applicant Technology Management design is in full firefighter access in full compliance and obtain a variance Management; the above THAT occupancy; a certificate THAT calenda

… (truncated, full text in PDF)